British judges and lawyers (or barristers as they call them) kinda’ look like out of some Renaissance-themed Hollywood movie. It’s tradition, you may say and we agree, but haven’t you wondered why they’re still wearing the same old, horsehair wigs that look and probably feel quite uncomfortable? The fact is, this tradition runs deep in their history, dating back to the 17th century, when the uniforms and wigs were meant to help distinguish judges and lawyers from the other people.
It isn’t only the wigs that are interesting, it’s also the uniforms. British law uniforms are dependant on the seasons and the types of cases. So, law isn’t that boring, after all, at least not in Great Britain.
Many strict rules both for robes and wigs
It seems it was quite a big deal back in 1625, when they wrote an academic paper on what the British high court officials should wear. The British courtroom wear is more than black and white. They also season these with robes of violet, green or scarlet, depending on the seasons or the types of cases. The colours have changed over the years, but the wigs stayed. In the 17th century when they were thinking how to dress the court members so they will look much different than the rest of the society, wigs were an important fashion trend. By 1685, they became part of the British legal wear.
But why are they still wearing wigs
A lot of things changed from the 17th century until today, but these British wigs didn’t. They represent the power of law and drive respect, or at least for some people. There’s also a more practical reason to why they wear still wear them: it makes them harder to be identified by criminals outside the courtroom. And last, but not least, the British definitely have a desire to keep close to their history and still play homage to their ancestors and tradition.